STORM-PE
Randomized Controlled Trial

First-of-its-kind RCT for acute intermediate-high
risk pulmonary embolism (PE).

CAVT – Now Proven by Level 1 Evidencec

heart and lungs logo encircled by a catheter with the text
newspaper icon

Prospective, Randomized Trial

lungs icon

Acute, Intermediate-High Risk PE

hospital icon

22 International Sites

person icon

100 Participants

  • Evaluate the efficacy and assess safety of treating acute, intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism with anticoagulation alone versus anticoagulation plus computer assisted vacuum thrombectomy (CAVT) with the Indigo® Aspiration System.

    • Change in RV/LV ratio assessed by CTPA at 48-hoursa
    • Major adverse events within 7 daysb
    • Functional outcomes and quality of life assessments at 90 days

    a. Results adjudicated by a blinded, independent imaging Core Lab
    b. Major adverse event is defined as a composite of clinical deterioration requiring escalation of care, PE-related mortality, symptomatic recurrent PE, or major bleeding.

  • STORM-PE patients were randomized 1:1, divided into the computer assisted vacuum thrombectomy (CAVT) plus anticoagulation arm or the anticoagulation alone arm.

    Computer Assisted Vacuum Thrombectomy plus Anticoagulation VS Anticoagulation alone

    • Symptom onset of 14 days or less
    • Acute PE with proximal filling defect confirmed by CTPA
    • Intermediate-high risk PE demonstrated by RV/LV ratio and elevated biomarkers

Trial Design Manuscript Published in American Heart Journal

ClinicalTrials.gov Study Site

Primary Endpoint

RV/LV Reduction Baseline to 48 Hours

CAVT arm demonstrated a significantly higher reduction in right heart strain (ΔRV/LV ratio) compared to AC

29/7% Relative Reduction > 13.1% Relative Reduction

gold bar chart showing a bar labeled "baseline" of "1.63" being higher than a bar labeled "48 hrs" of "1.11" in the "CAVT Arm (n=46)" and another grey bar chart showing a bar labeled "baseline" of "1.56" being higher than a bar labeled "48 hours" of "1.56" in the "AC ARM (N=52)"

48 Hour RV/LV Reduction > 0.2 (Expanded Analysis)

Significantly more patients in the CAVT arm had a treatment effect

Bar chart showing gold bar having value of 78.3% being higher than grey bar having value of 51.9%

Safety Endpoint

CAVT showed no increase in composite safety rate compared to AC, with numerically fewer Major Adverse Events (MAE) in the CAVT armd
  • Composite MAE ≤ 7 Days (%, n)

    bar chart showing a gold bar having the value of 4.3% being lower than a grey bar having a value of 7.5%

  • Major Bleeding (BARC 3a-5)e

    gold bar having value of 2.1% higher than grey bar having value of 1.9%

Procedure Data
  • Device Time (median)

    25 min

    [15.0, 41.0]

  • Procedure Time (median)

    56 min

    [42.0, 69.0]

  • mPAP Reduction (mean)

    27.3%

    (8.2 mmHg)

  • Technical
    Successf

    100%

    (47/47)

  • Device Related Transfusion

    0%

    (0/47)

More to Come at VIVA 2025

National Principal Investigators

Rachel Rosovsky, MD

Hematology

Massachusetts General Hospital

Robert Lookstein, MD

Interventional Radiology

Mount Sinai Hospital

Steering Committee Members

Ido Weinberg, MD

Vascular Medicine

Massachusetts General Brigham

Richard Channick, MD

Pulmonology

UCLA Medical Center

John Moriarty, MD

Interventional Radiology

UCLA Medical Center

Sahil Parikh, MD

Interventional Cardiology

Columbia University Medical Center

Stavros Konstantinides, MD

Cardiology

University Medical Center Mainz

Suhail Dohad, MD

Interventional Cardiology

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Richard Davis

Patient Representative

c. DATA NOT YET PUBLISHED. Presented by Lookstein, R. STORM-PE A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Anticoagulation Alone vs. Anticoagulation Plus Mechanical Aspiration with the Indigo Aspiration System for the Treatment of Intermediate High Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Presented at: TCT (Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics); October 26, 2025; San Francisco, CA.
d. STORM-PE was not powered to detect differences in safety
e. Type 3a was not considered major bleeding if it was related to an expected decrease in hemoglobin level due to fluid administration and if transfusion was less than 2 units
f. Ability of catheter to access clot and perform aspiration
STORM-PE demonstrated superiority to anticoagulation utilizing Lightning Flash® 1.0 and 2.0. The clinical results presented herein are for informational purposes only, and may not be predictive for all patients. Individual results may vary based on patient specific-attributes and other factors

Questions?

Contact us to learn more about our products and company